Paul Eggert wrote: > Thanks, I finally got around to looking at this and got similar > performance results to yours. That __attribute__((noinline)) bothers > me, though, as it's not portable and is a bit inelegant. I figured > out a different way to avoid the inlining, and tweaked the commentary > a bit, and so installed the attached additional patch after installing > your patches.
Excellent. Thanks for the review and additional improvement. I don't like that my patch have uses `((noinline)) __attribute __' which isn't portable, but you fix it.
