On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Norihiro Tanaka <nori...@kcn.ne.jp> wrote: > Norihiro Tanaka <nori...@kcn.ne.jp> wrote: >> Sorry, I investigated many cases, but I couldn't find it. >> >> When this bug is reproduced, must be s == 0 and s1 > 0 and >> d->newlines[s] != d->newlines[s1]. In addition, they mustn't be >> updated until reaches a next newline. >> >> I believe that all of them is never filled at the same time. So I think >> once I close the bug without fix. > > Sorry, I have closed bug#18642 instead of bug#18645 by my mistake. This > bug isn't done. Can you re-open it?
18642 was auto-filed for my message saying I want to make a release soon. That is not an issue that deserves to have an open bug number, so it is fine that you closed it.
