Hello, > > If the \. sequence cannot be used to suppress the meaning of > > control character at the beginning of the line, it makes no sense > > to > > use this sequence at all. Am I right? > > No, see below.
I see. :-) So what about replacing: An uninterpreted dot (period), even at start of line. With: An uninterpreted dot (period), even at start of line within a macro. Not very precise, but less confusing? Jan _______________________________________________ bug-groff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-groff
