Update of bug #43239 (project groff):
Status: None => Invalid
Assigned to: None => wl
Open/Closed: Open => Closed
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #1:
Well, it's definitely not a bug. In groff, a `diversion' really does what its
name says: It diverts *formatted* groff output from the normal output stream
to a macro. Of course, this includes line numbering.
The proper way to solve this issue is to switch environments, e.g.
... before diversion ...
.ev my-env
.di my-div
... diversion text ...
.br
.di
.ev
... after diversion ...
.di my-div
... more text ...
(and don't forgot to end a diversion with `.br' to finish the current
partially collected line).
I'm closing this as invalid. However, I invite you to discuss documentation
improvements on the groff mailing list, which is a better place than this
tracker issue.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43239>
_______________________________________________
Nachricht gesendet von/durch Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
bug-groff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-groff
