Bjarni,

i don't have the time to read your long-winded rants, and i doubt
that others have.

Please go away.

The point of my reply to this ticket was that wading through such
tickets to find whether anything of value is hidden in them is not
worth the time and effort it requires.  Quite obviously, that implies
that explaining in detail why the aspects of the ticket that are
bogus, unimportant, and wrong are so is even less worth the time
it would require.  Explaining it is also useless because it's obvious
to anyone with sufficient experience.

  *****************************************************************
  I'm hereby asking for the OK of another project member to close
  this ticket as "Closed/Invalid".
  *****************************************************************

I'm including the relevant part of my original mail for easier
reference:

  The "Details:" section of your report is inscrutable gibberish,
  some of the content - as far as it can be guessed what it is
  supposed to mean - is obvious bogus advice, some of it is of
  very little importance (like the Oxford comma), and the patch
  is obviously not fit for committing.

Ingo

_______________________________________________
bug-groff mailing list
bug-groff@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-groff

Reply via email to