Follow-up Comment #5, bug #53314 (project groff):
1)
This is my latest version of strip.sed
/%beginstrip%/,$ {
/^\.ig$/,/^\.\./d
s/^\([.']\)[ ]*/\1/
s/^\(\\![.']\)[ ]*/\1/
/^\.\\"/d
/^\\#/d
s/\\#.*/\\/
s/\\"..*/\\"/
/\.[ad]s/ !s/[ ]*\\"//
/\.[ad]s/ s/\([^ ]\)\\"/\1/
}
/^\.$/d
Checked with the following script:
#!/bin/sh
#Compare stripped with unstripped versions of tmac files.
output=/tmp/tmac.u.s.diff
# get list of all tmac files
test_dir=/tmp/tmac.test
if test -d $test_dir ;then
rm -f $test_dir/*
else
mkdir $test_dir
fi
#cp $(find . -name '*.tmac' -o -name '*-u') $test_dir
cp -t $test_dir $(find $HOME/git/groff -name '*-u')
rm -f $output
cd $test_dir
for item in * ; do
sed -f $HOME/bin/strip.sed $item | \
diff -w ${item} - >> $output || :
done
sed -i -e '/^< \. *\\"/d' -e '/^< \.$/d' -e '/^[0-9]\+[,d][0-9]\+d*$/d'
$output
Noticed one case of insufficient protection in file "e.tmac-u",
reported in groff bug nr. 53760.
2) My change was wrong, as noticed in comment #2
I have not yet compiled groff with my version of "strip.sed".
My aim is to make a stripped version of all macro files available for
use, at least for myself.
Why may (should) users not have a choice?
###
Something about "education":
Seen on Usenet forum "alt.education"
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 22:28:57 GMT
www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/04/k12_how_our_schools_make_monsters.html
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53314>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
bug-groff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-groff
