Follow-up Comment #4, bug #50917 (project groff):
> Unfortunately, there is no better option, and none can be designed.
You did list the solution:
\(hm : U+002D : hyphen-minus
This would provide what I ask for.
If you accept \(pl and \(mi, what is wrong with \(hm ?
Why do you call one "ugly", when the other two are not "ugly"?
> groff -Thtml is notoriously weak
All the other problems of "groff -Thtml" are not interesting here. If you
introduce \(hm, surely it is possible to map it to U+002D in "groff -Thtml".
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50917>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
bug-groff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-groff
