URL:
  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?54959>

                 Summary: [PATCH] various minor documentation corrections
                 Project: GNU troff
            Submitted by: barx
            Submitted on: Mon 05 Nov 2018 04:18:31 AM CST
                Category: None
                Severity: 3 - Normal
              Item Group: Documentation
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
             Assigned to: None
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
         Planned Release: None

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

The attached patch fixes various (very minor) grammatical errors and typos in
groff documentation files.  Most of its changes should be self-explanatory.  A
couple that might need a little explanation:

 - http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nonnegative says that
"nonnegative" should be spelled without a hyphen, but throughout the groff
documentation, it is spelled "non-negative," so I changed the one instance of
"nonnegative" to comply with the majority.

 - The groff.texi example for the dn and dl registers concluded with both a
.rr @s and a .rm @s.  I removed the latter, which was unnecessary because the
example code never defined @s as a macro, diversion, or string, only as a
register.

This patch updates the files:

PROBLEMS
contrib/chem/chem.1.man
doc/groff.texi
doc/meref.me
doc/pic.ms



    _______________________________________________________

File Attachments:


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon 05 Nov 2018 04:18:31 AM CST  Name: groff.doc.patch  Size: 4KiB   By:
barx

<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=45361>

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?54959>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/


_______________________________________________
bug-groff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-groff

Reply via email to