Follow-up Comment #5, bug #57592 (project groff):

> I regret my lack of clarity in characterizing my objection earlier.  In fact
I think our "include guards" could be improved by keying of a simple that is
_only_ there for the purpose of detecting multiple inclusion.

s/keying of a simple/keying off a symbol/

And while I'm here I will add that doing the above would be irritating for
`an-old.tmac` at least, which pledges itself to classical troff compatibility
and therefore has matchbox-sized namespace.


Reply to this item at:


  Message sent via Savannah

Reply via email to