Follow-up Comment #5, bug #57592 (project groff):

> I regret my lack of clarity in characterizing my objection earlier.  In fact
I think our "include guards" could be improved by keying of a simple that is
_only_ there for the purpose of detecting multiple inclusion.

s/keying of a simple/keying off a symbol/

And while I'm here I will add that doing the above would be irritating for
`an-old.tmac` at least, which pledges itself to classical troff compatibility
and therefore has matchbox-sized namespace.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57592>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/


Reply via email to