Follow-up Comment #2, bug #60372 (project groff):
[comment #1 comment #1:]
> For better or worse, we're at the mercy of the system libc to
> get year 2038 right.
That's entirely appropriate; groff shouldn't attempt to reinvent anything in
libc, and if a system's libc is date-limited, incorrect dates in groff will be
among the less severe problems those users will experience come epoch
rollover.
So I agree, there's nothing here that needs to be addressed in the groff
documentation.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60372>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
