Follow-up Comment #2, bug #58946 (project groff):
OK, now that I've bothered to read the entire message I just linked to, there
appears to be at least one task on the ms/pdfmark to-do list:
>> In the groff system, XN is defined in spdf.tmac
>
> Which, I would suggest, it should NOT be ....
>
> Since it is provided purely as an example, it has no place in
> ANY of the standard macro packages; it would be more appropriate
> to relocate it to an "examples" repository, and, in hindsight
> I should have defined it directly within pdfmark.ms
Keith, if this is the only task, I'll update this bug's Summary accordingly.
(Probably the summary needs to be updated anyway, since your post implies the
bulk of the work for integrating ms and pdfmark is done, with merely some
housekeeping left to take care of.)
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58946>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
