Follow-up Comment #3, bug #61036 (project groff):
I'm still baffled by this report. I don't understand what is breaking or how
your proposed patch fixes it.
libgroff does not provide its own implementation of fprintf. It uses the
system's. It might use a libgnu (a.k.a. gnulib) replacement, but if so then
the existing LDADD definition should suffice to bring it in.
Here's a list of printf-ish object file names in a recent build of mine.
$ find build -name "*printf*"
build/lib/printf-frexpl.o
build/lib/printf-frexp.o
build/lib/printf-parse.o
build/lib/vasnprintf.o
build/lib/printf-args.o
build/lib/.deps/vsnprintf.Po
build/lib/.deps/printf-frexpl.Po
build/lib/.deps/fprintf.Po
build/lib/.deps/asnprintf.Po
build/lib/.deps/snprintf.Po
build/lib/.deps/vasnprintf.Po
build/lib/.deps/printf-frexp.Po
build/lib/.deps/printf-parse.Po
build/lib/.deps/printf-args.Po
build/lib/asnprintf.o
Can you share the error output of a failed compilation? And since you're
using "additional options", can you also share a _minimal_ set of such
additional options that provoke the compilation failure in question?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61036>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
