Follow-up Comment #6, bug #61433 (project groff):
The top of env.h has the comment
// declarations to avoid friend name injection problems
followed by a lengthy list of prototypes, including do_divert(). All of these
functions are later listed again when they're made friends of class
environment. If do_divert() is omitted from the first list but retained in
the second (as proposed in comment #4), does it warrant a comment to explain
the discrepancy to future readers?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61433>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
