Follow-up Comment #12, bug #57538 (project groff):
I'll play with it some more, but I'm not making the general claim that .ne is
broken in pure roff, only that it exhibits off-by-one behavior under -me (and
under -mm, if Ulrich is to be believed, though I haven't tested this). That
is, it's perhaps not purely a -me bug or an .ne one, but something subtle in
the interactions of these things.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57538>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
