Follow-up Comment #4, bug #62339 (project groff):
There must be a separate paragraph about "\s0" and mentioning of 0
for \s+-N dropped.
Adding text to document the use of "\s0":
\s0 Restores the previous type size.
Does not restore the intended type size if there is a type size
shift before it, like "\s<i>...\s<n>...\s0...\s0" (restores
\s<i>+<n>, not that before \s<i>).
The best practice is not to use it.
The second best practice is not to use it after a variable,
as it might contain "\s0".
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62339>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
