Update of bug #59290 (project groff):
Status: Postponed => None
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #5:
I think I have it.
backtrace.
...with the trailing dot, following Kernighan's addition of `c.` to
device-independent troff (1981).
There is no need to add a counterpart read-only, leading-dot register like
`.c`. I think Kernighan's idea was that that register didn't need to be
read-only in the first place.
Un-postponing, but not sure when I will work on this.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59290>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
