Follow-up Comment #37, bug #58736 (project groff):
Thanks for the quick update! (Maybe a little TOO quick... I was already doing
the manual edits and not monitoring email when you posted this.)
I ended up adding the one new line (initializing _f) in the problem block and
am running some tests now. So, reviewing your other pending changes, it
appears all I'm missing are the .do's on @err (shouldn't matter, as I never
use compatibility mode) and the initialization of ?f, which I presume to be a
documentary matter and not a functional one.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58736>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
