Follow-up Comment #8, bug #62398 (project groff): In the original code, I also wonder--since the "new" isn't protected by a "len > 0" check--why the memcpy is. Surely a memcpy() on a zero-length string is effectively a no-op.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62398>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
