Follow-up Comment #4, bug #64005 (project groff):
[comment #3 comment #3:]
> Presumably the situation of interest is one where the document author
> invokes `ns`, interesting things happen, and then they invoke `bp`.
Right, or I was thinking more of a situation akin to the one that exposed this
bug: where an ms user defines some local macro that includes an .ns, and
somtimes calls that macro followed by a .bp. Unless .de is also verboten to
ms users.
Anyway, this was an off-the-cuff observation; as a non-ms user, I'm in no
position to evaluate how valid the concern is, and what I glean from the rest
of your message is "not very." I trust that anyone with real objections will
respond to the step-by-step proposal in the email thread.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64005>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
