Follow-up Comment #10, bug #63133 (project groff): [comment #9 comment #9:] > [comment #8 comment #8:] > > The underlying issue, with pdfroff, was fixed by > > [https://osdn.net/users/keith/pf/groff-pdfmark/scm/commits/5d88cef1407d5bb625a1c23a888976f6efa80fab commit 5d88cef1407d5bb625a1c23a888976f6efa80fab]:
> > 2023-02-24 Keith Marshall <address@hidden> > > > > Do not emit redundant 'pdfhref Z' records. > > > > * pdfroff.sh [grohtml-info] (pdfhref Z): Adapt awk script, to emit... > > (pdfhref Z 0 0 0): ...this conditionally, only if at least one prior > > record has been emitted; delete unconditional emission, which caused > > the anomaly reported as groff issue #63133. > > > > Okay to close? > > Hi Keith, > > I'd prefer not to close it here since it still affects groff's > pdfroff and therefore likely the 1.23.0 release. > > Unless we cherry-pick the fix... Okay. You might consider just copying my latest pdfroff.sh, accompanying pdfroff.1.man, and everything in my tmac/ subtree, *except* s.tmac, (which is just a verbatim copy of yours, at the time I forked groff-pdfmark, and yours has evolved since then), but I'll leave it to your discretion. > BTW, are you sure about that commit link? Oops! It looks like I copied, and pasted the wrong link; it should have been [https://osdn.net/users/keith/pf/groff-pdfmark/scm/commits/69c99bee3ce93ddaae89026d61cea9bc75ecf453 commit #69c99bee]; (I should have noticed that the hash wasn't as I expected). > It seems to go to this change: > Clean up Z-shell initialization logic. > > * pdfroff.sh [ZSH_VERSION]: Tidy initialization code for... > (NULLCMD, emulate sh): ...these; bring it more into alignment with > contemporary GNU autoconf usage. Indeed. That's the immediate parent of the intended commit. > In any case I'll take responsibility for it, on the assumption I'll > be able to cherry-pick, and mark it "Confirmed" for want of a status > that means "fix available elsewhere". Okay; I'll leave it with you. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63133> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
