Follow-up Comment #10, bug #63635 (group groff):

[comment #9 comment #9:]
> [comment #7 comment #7:]
>> A patch I've recently submitted to neatroff might be relevant here.
> 
> Neatroff's maintainer can of course make his own call about this, but I would
> prefer to see patches to other roffs that mimic enhancements to groff use the
> same syntax as groff's version of the enhancement if at all feasible.  This
> increases cross compatibility, benefiting users by letting them move more
> easily from one roff implementation to another.

Sorry for not responding earlier, I wasn't notified of your reply and didn't
check.

neatroff's maintainer's opinion is that this change is unnecessary, because
one can save the hyphenation mode to a register before disabling it.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63635>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to