Follow-up Comment #9, bug #60927 (group groff): [comment #6 comment #6:] > pdfmark is no longer distributed with groff. Yes, and thus closing (on this tracker) is appropriate; however... > Closing as invalid. ...classification as "invalid" seems kind of harsh. After all, this ticket was certainly valid, at the time when Kurt originally submitted it, and development _is_ ongoing, at https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/groff-pdfmark/; perhaps Kurt, (or any other interested party), could be invited to review the state of the documentation, as it can currently be found there, and open a new ticket, on the associated bug tracker, if any further improvements are deemed to be necessary?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60927>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
