Follow-up Comment #7, bug #44235 (group groff): [comment #6 comment #6:] > The fonts listed in DESC have the "special" keyword in them > but are not treated the same as fonts introduced with .special. > I think they should be treated the same.
In the original submission of bug #63366 I observed that not all special fonts
are equivalently special. Neither Branden nor I knows whether this is
intentional.
> However this will not help with your wish to "mask out" a specific
> font/glyph combination the way .char does with the current font.
Right, the two situations this ticket contemplates are at opposite ends of the
character search list. They're thematically related enough to warrant
cohabiting in the same ticket, but as you point out one of them could be
solved with some structural changes rather than a new .*char request.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?44235>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
