Update of bug #67453 (group groff):

                  Status:                    None => Postponed

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #1:

As I noted in comment 9 to bug #66653:


While exploring the issues you've raised here, I've discovered that
`chop` is not exactly fully armed and operational.  It only "kind of"
works, but satisfies the one use case that motivated it; see bug #67453.

Solving it properly looks like a heavy lift.  GNU troff has yet more
bespoke container types for macro/string/diversion contents, `char_list`
and `node_list`, and I lack the courage to refactor these away before
the 1.24 release.


Setting Status to "Postponed" accordingly.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?67453>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to