Update of bug #67837 (group groff):

                  Status:                    None => Need Info
             Assigned to:                    None => barx
                 Summary: Document flag interaction of character class and
individual character => document flag interaction of character class and
individual character

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #1:

I think before I can document this interaction intelligently, I need to
understand it.  Can you deploy the newly enhanced `pchar` request against bug
#67571?

I'm wondering if maybe the "lazy" character-flag ORing that Werner introduced
as an optimization is going awry.  The enhanced `pchar` request now
distinguishes flags "inherent" to the character from those absorbed via class
membership.


$ ~/groff-HEAD/bin/nroff -mja
.pchar \C'[CJKprepunct]'
character class '[CJKprepunct]'
  defined at: file name: "/home/branden/src/GIT/groff/build/../tmac/ja.tmac",
line number: 32
  contains code points: U+002C U+003A U+003B U+003E U+007D U+3001 U+3002
U+FF0C U+FF0E U+30FB U+FF1A U+FF1B U+FF1F U+FF01 U+FF09 U+3015 U+FF3D U+FF5D
U+300D U+300F U+3011 U+3041 U+3043 U+3045 U+3047 U+3049 U+3063 U+3083 U+3085
U+3087 U+30FC U+30A1 U+30A3 U+30A5 U+30A7 U+30A9 U+30C3 U+30E3 U+30E5 U+30E7 
  flags: 128 (prohibits break before)
.pchar ,
character ','
  is not translated
  does not have a macro
  special translation: 0
  hyphenation code: 0
  inherent flags: 0 (none)
  effective flags: 128 (prohibits break before)
  asciify code: 0
  ASCII code: 44
  Unicode mapping: U+002C
  is found
  is transparently translatable
  is not translatable as input
  mode: normal


Maybe this ticket should _depend_ on bug #67571, but I don't suppose I'll know
for sure until understanding is achieved.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?67837>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to