Follow-up Comment #11, bug #67817 (group groff): [comment #10 comment #10:] > This syntax would be _no more_ ambiguous than the status quo ante.
I think that's the only bar it need meet. Said status quo ante could itself
be ambiguous, since a document might redefine a .char character any number of
times over the course of its run.
And it's far less ambiguous than the status quo.
[comment #9 comment #9:]
> User-defined characters would still be unidentified as such,
That's fine; their used-definedness was never the issue, it was the mapping of
_all_ of them to the same string that increased ambiguity.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?67817>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
