Follow-up Comment #7, bug #67992 (group groff): [comment #2 comment #2:] > It's not a regression to issue a diagnostic when encountering an > ill-formed input document when no diagnostic was issued before.
Mostly agreed. However, if the new diagnostic points to something with no
apparent relation to the ill-formedness, it's also not a _pro_gression.
> I need you and Ingo Schwarze to understand that "behavior
> change" is not synonymous with "regression".
This sounds like a straw-man reduction of both our positions. The obvious
conclusion of a "behavior change = regression" postulate is that software
should never change, and neither of us has espoused that view.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?67992>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
