Follow-up Comment #6, bug #68136 (group groff): [comment #4 comment #4:] > There is a slight risk with CJK fonts since a single document > may contain 1000s of different glyphs, which would require > multiple subsets of the same base font, but I think I can live > with it. (Its worse odds than winning the UK lottery).
OK, but given two equally simple algorithms, one of which guarantees
uniqueness and one of which requires every user to not win the lottery on
every run of the program, wouldn't the guarantee be the better choice?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68136>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
