Follow-up Comment #13, bug #65716 (group groff): I don't have a firm grasp on all this, so please forgive (or, better, correct) any misguided statements below.
If the AGL is out of date (as implied by comment #10), then using a more
current source seems like the right (obvious?) answer, but that leaves the
comment #8 question: what's the authoritative source for this updated data?
Deri proposed one in comment #10 and asked "Is this authorative enough?" but
this drew no response--which to me implies no one objects to it and afmtodit
could go ahead and use it.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65716>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
