Follow-up Comment #2, bug #68348 (group groff): At 2026-05-14T19:00:55-0400, Deri James wrote: > Update of bug #68348 (group groff): > > Assigned to: deri => gbranden > > _______________________________________________________ > > Follow-up Comment #1: > > What was the bug # where I gave the reason why it should be reverted > for gropdf. I remember you saying you did not test before committing > for pdf.
Looks like it was bug #67971.
> For ps you said you had lost the font you used to test grops, and
> referred me to the original patch submission. Unfortunately that did
> not help since it does not go into what you have to do with the ttf
> font mentioned, i.e. do you have to run fontforge to produce a pfa,
> what do you change in the JPM file, what do you put in the grops
> download file, can you use fontinstall.sh.
>
> I never got grops to work with any of the CJK fonts I test with
> gropdf, worse, the postscript file produced with using JPM as a font
> just crashed ghostscript.
Good Lord.
> Please can you help by producing some documentation whicb shows how to
> successfully use JPM with a mincho style font successfully with grops
> so I can see what it is meant to be doing.
Ah, fair. Homework for me, then!
I wonder if we can lure TANAKA Takuji back...
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68348>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
