Follow-up Comment #3, bug #68339 (group groff):

Bjarni replied to the list, and one of our list moderators approved his
message, meaning Bjarni lacks an incentive to reply properly to the Savannah
ticket.

And here, I'll further reduce that incentive by quoting the mail!


On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 05:53:57AM -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Update of bug #68339 (group groff):
> 
> Status:                    None => Need Info
> Summary:  Warnings from clang-21 => compiler warnings from
> clang-21 during build
> 
> _______________________________________________________
> 
> Follow-up Comment #2:
> 
> Do these compiler warnings correspond to a build of your fork of _groff_ or
> to
> the stock _groff_ 1.24.1 release, or a specific commit on the master branch
> of
> _groff_'s Git repository?
> 
  The used version is the master branch with

commit 1a59f8a2a39e20fa5c7ea25b766b550e210c7560 (HEAD -> master)
Merge: 9e4958fc9 316c9da4a
Author: Bjarni Ingi Gislason <[email protected]>
Date:   Sat May 9 13:59:06 2026 +0000

    Merge branch 'master' of https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/groff

commit 316c9da4a67b5ba404d9551902a7c7cbc88d9dc7 (origin/master,
origin/HEAD)
Author: G. Branden Robinson <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri May 8 21:58:13 2026 -0500

    [ms]: Clarify intro to macro call syntax in docs.

    This new language is worded in the same order you type things, and
    importantly doesn't ignore the cases where macros take arguments.


Bjarni,

The data you've given me are therefore not a valid reflection of GNU _groff_.
Whether rebased, merged, or fast-fowarded, a tree containing your commits does
not represent the state of the GNU _groff_ code base and your item is not
actionable by its developers.

Are you willing to re-run your analysis against, say, an unpacked , pristine
_groff_ 1.24.1 source archive?

You can get one here:

https://mirrors.ocf.berkeley.edu/gnu/groff/groff-1.24.1.tar.gz


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68339>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to