Follow-up Comment #15, bug #42675 (group groff):

Oops, I didn't read thoroughly enough: comment #8 used erroneous input and
comment #10 has the corrected output, and it seems to have omitted Solaris 10
(though which nroff was used for one of the examples is ambiguous).


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?42675>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to