Follow-up Comment #4, bug #68445 (group groff):
> Yeah, that needs to not be a "style" warning.
I retract that. It's appropriate as a "style" warning *if* we have to (or
choose to) leave the semantics of the request ambiguous.
But I've had such a hard time devising unambiguous ones that whether I can
pull it off remains to be seen. I'll leave that in the scope of bug #68256.
For this ticket, the problem is only the issue that the formatter seems to
perceive the presence of garbage after the numeric second argument as a third.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68445>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
