Follow-up Comment #8, bug #68271 (group groff):
[comment #7 comment #7:] > At 2026-04-24T13:44:03-0400, Vincent Lefèvre wrote: >> Follow-up Comment #6, bug #68271 (group groff): >>> Do you know where I should best send patches addressing issues in >>> fvwm 2's man pages? >> >> I've just submitted a bug report concerning the Fvwm2Cpp(1) man page >> at least: >> >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1134825 >> >> So patches could be sent to this bug, where a tag "patch" can then be >> added. >> >> Then let's hope that the Debian maintainer will publish a new version >> (but end users can also rebuild the package from the source + the >> patch, which is something I often do). > > Acknowledged. I'll see if I can knock something together. I did the aforementioned knocking together on 28 April. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1134825#16 _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68271> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
