Follow-up Comment #2, bug #68727 (group groff): [comment #1 comment #1:] > -.if '\\*[qrf*caller]'' .@abort qrf*caller string not initialized > +.if \\*[qrf*file]'' .@abort qrf*caller string not initialized
I did not test, but purely from code inspection, this looks wrong.
The existing condition looks like a string comparison to me, with the meaning
"expand the string and test whether the result is empty."
In the new condition, the opening single quote of the condition appears to
have been accidentally deleted, so the first character of the file name will
be misinterpreted as the delimiter, or if that character is c, d, e, n, or r,
really weird stuff is likely to happen.
Right?
Also, is it really such a good idea to test qrf*file and if that's empty,
write an error message about qrf*caller?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68727>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
