One vote for UNDI here, at least as a back-up mechanism. Message: 1 Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 11:40:29 -0700 From: Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: OKUJI Yoshinori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Time to fork the netboot code? According to OKUJI Yoshinori: > <URL:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg03333.html> No, I didn't see that. > As you said, Etherboot drivers have defects (for us), but IMO, it is > NOT feasible to maintain ethernet drivers by ourselves, considerring > that we are a small community, and the netboot feature of GRUB is an > "extra" feature anyway. So transition to a more powerful set of > device drivers would be necessary. Hm. Has anyone started on this? -- Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "We have no fuel on board, plus or minus 8 kilograms." -- NEAR tech _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
