>>>>> OKUJI Yoshinori writes:

 OY>   At last /sbin/grub became useful, so I'm going to work on LBA
 OY> support again. I assume that you're working on BSD/Mach device
 OY> syntax and new naming syntax like (hd0:0x83). Is that right?

My first priority is code cleanups and docs/grub.texi.  The existing
documentation is too vague and outdated, and I hate HTML for searching
and indexing.  I keep getting lost in cmdline.c because I don't
understand Erich's clever overloading of variables and lack of
comments.

Once I have enough documentation, then I'll work on making
installation using /sbin/grub easier (part of which will be adding
command-line options to /sbin/grub for noninteractive use, as well as
more useful partition syntaxes like the ones you mentioned).

When that is done, other peoples' changes are merged, and tested, I
think GRUB will be useful enough to call version 1.0.

Adding a new scripting language, serial device support,
internationalization, and/or network booting will all wait until later
(unless somebody gives us patches that we like against the latest
CVS).  I think adding those features will be enough changes to bump
GRUB's version to 2.0. ;)

-- 
 Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/)
Committed to freedom and diversity \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)

Reply via email to