Hello OKUJI Yoshinori!
On Sun, 23 April 2000 at 11:33:49, you wrote:
> From: Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: enhanced password feature
> Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 19:37:38 -0500
>
> > Maybe the command should be ``authenticate.'' This may be more self
> > explanatory.
>
> Hmm... But does this sound like the command itself authenticates
> something? How about "protect" or "privileged"?
I consider 'lock' to be just fine as there is no notion of
'identity' inside GRUB. It simply is a 'locked' entry
that needs to get 'unlocked' with a password as the 'key'
- right? Maybe 'locked', or 'protected' then - no idea
which is better. The 'privileged' thing is not suitable
IMHO as it suggests that there might be more functionality
or some additional feature which could be misleading.
Well - maybe 'password-protected'? Lenghty, but quite
self-explanatory.
/bye
Dirk
