Thanks Okuji for your kind reply.
> That's right, but multi-architecture support is one of the goals in
> GRUB 1.0 (or 2.0) which should be rewritten almost from scratch.
>
> Probably, I should mention my idea more exactly: I don't think
> *current* design and implementation of GRUB is portable
Fine. This clears all of my doubts. Thanks.
>> /alessandro, guessing how many developers are currently hacking grub..
> Should I answer this? :)
I hope so. I'd like to know how my irrelevant stuff is taking time
from real work...
/alessandro
