>>>>> Rogelio M Serrano writes:
105 if (type == KERNEL_TYPE_MULTIBOOT)
106 entry_addr = (entry_func) pu.elf->e_entry;
107 else
108 entry_addr = (entry_func) (pu.elf->e_entry & 0xFFFFFF);
109
110 if (((int) entry_addr) < 0x100000)
111 errnum = ERR_BELOW_1MB;
RMS> in line 110 if my e_entry is 0xf0100000 we should not get an
RMS> error right? same with line 520: my p_addr this time is
RMS> 0x100000
[...]
RMS> am i getting the error at 111?
The problem I see is that the test at 110 looks like:
if (((int) 0xf0100000) < 0x100000)
Try this on your own, and you'll see that the problem is the (int)
cast turning your large address into a negative number. Perhaps a
better test would be:
if (entry_addr < (entry_func) 0x100000)
Of course, this is all speculation, since I can't check the results
myself at the moment.
I hope this helps you,
--
Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> //\ I'm a FIG (http://fig.org/)
Committed to freedom and diversity \// Run Bash (http://fig.org/gnu/bash/)
_______________________________________________
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
