From: Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Time to fork the netboot code? Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 11:40:29 -0700 > > "extra" feature anyway. So transition to a more powerful set of > > device drivers would be necessary. > > Hm. Has anyone started on this? No, AFAIK. However, you cannot do this alone. It is necessary to implement real memory management and handle protected-mode interrupts and real-mode ones concurrently, using v86-mode. That is exactly the plan which should be done after 1.0 release. Okuji _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
- Time to fork the netboot code? Chip Salzenberg
- RE: Time to fork the netboot code? Gregg C Levine
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code? OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code? Chip Salzenberg
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code? OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code? Chip Salzenberg
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code? Thierry Laronde
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code? Mario Klebsch
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code? Chip Salzenberg
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code? Mario Klebsch
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code? Christoph Plattner
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code? Thierry Laronde
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code? OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code? Mario Klebsch
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code? OKUJI Yoshinori
