On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Jason Thomas wrote: > so this is only needed on older kernels? and isn't this already > configurable using ./configure, my main concern was how many systems > will I break if I change it in the debian package? Why is it hurting anything? I was having a problem with Grub getting a 0-length mem range at 4 GB passed from the BIOS, but I have submitted a patch to the maintainers (now in CVS) to prevent that situation. It's probably not the worst thing for a sane bootloader to pass mem info to the kernel it loads. And unless the info it's passing is known to be bad, why prevent it from doing so? Derrik Pates | Sysadmin, Douglas School | #linuxOS on EFnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] | District (dsdk12.net) | #linuxOS on OPN _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
