Hello, On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 04:42:43PM +0900, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > At Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:21:33 +0100, > Thierry Laronde wrote: > > > Do you have an idea if your patch will be applied to the official tree? > > > > No. The decision belongs to the official maintainers. > > If you have written the patch at an earlier stage (i.e. when GRUB was > a boot loader only for maniacs like me), I would be glad to apply it > as soon as possible. But I hesitate to do that, because it has a > substantial change on the bootstrap and the low-level disk I/O > system. So I'd like to leave it alone, until we release the next > version 0.91. > > I must admit that the reason why 0.91 doesn't appear yet is that I > didn't devote my spare time to GRUB so much... But I also had other > things I wished to do. Anyway, I'll come back to the development > seriously sooner or later.
This is our common "doom": I also work on something else at the moment, even if there are several things I'd like to do with/for GRUB ;) > > BTW, do you know how stable your patch is at the moment? At the moment, everything seems to work OK for people who have tried it, but I have been a bit disappointed to see that the courageous were only 10 or less... To have a major chance to get feedback the patch needs to be integrated to the CVS. Could we have two branches, one stable and one unstable? BTW, _in theory_, everything working till now should work as well, but this version adds new possibilities. Cheers, -- Thierry Laronde (Alceste) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
