At Sat, 19 Jan 2002 00:32:31 +0900, Yoshinori K. Okuji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I'll do that. As I already know what's wrong thanks to your > report, I don't think it would be difficult to fix the problem.
Hmm. I think my estimation was too optimistic again. I know how I should fix the problem, but that requires substantial changes in the code. So I keep that pending for a while. BTW, I noticed that your previous change made it nearly meaningless to handle a dumb terminal in get_cmdline. The reason why I rewrote get_cmdline was that it should be functional even with dumb terminals. So... Is it necessary to stick to the current implementation of get_cmdline? I guess you disabled the command-line editing in the case of a dumb terminal, because Emacs has its own editing feature and it is available before sending inputs to GRUB. Generally speaking, is this a good assumption for dumb terminals? Okuji _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
