On Saturday 26 January 2002 05:21 pm, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > At Sat, 26 Jan 2002 15:21:18 +0100, > > That's true in your case, as you chose the LILO way. Generally > speaking, however, GRUB is much more flexible. I think it always makes > things complex to obtain flexiblity (e.g. consider autoconf vs. imake), > and that's not so bad to have as a trade-off. > I know GRUB is much more flexible than LILO, that's why I consider a migration. I thank you for your time, but I don't really consider building temporary sed scripts a model of clarity.
I'll probably create a LILO-compatible GRUB patch for my own use, but I won't bother to send you the patch, because you clearly don't think it useful. Because GRUB is open source, I don't have to (try to) convince you. We can each go our way, and be happy. I really like GRUB! Cheers, Han Holl _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
