On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 04:44:44PM +0100, Yoshinori Okuji wrote: > > Please understand at least this point: GRUB would be GRUB even if support for > Linux is omitted, while GRUB would not be GRUB if support for Multiboot > disappears. > > The reason why I may compromise without finishing Multiboot issues is just that > the missing features are not necessary to boot Multiboot-compliant OSes in > most cases (such as GNU/Hurd).
Agreed. Moreover, it should be noted that as a GNU project, GRUB's primary purpose is being part of the GNU system (i.e: GNU/Hurd). -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion) _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
