Gregg C Levine wrote:
It wasn't quite clear after the 1st reply, but after the 2nd and 3rd i see that grub.conf is an add-on by the distros, including the splash image. Since the official version doesn't have a splash image, i do not think i will be trying to official version, because i already have it working with a terminal-based menu. But if i ever have free cycles to spend on the splash image on a BarcoMed monitor, i'll look into it.Hello from Gregg C Levine What of the many replies by Okuji do you not understand? The versions of GRUB that we release, and in a way support, do not use splash screens. Those versions are modified by the vender. Yours resembles the ones that I recall seeing mentioned in a statement from the Fedora group, and it might have also come from Gentoo, and also from SuSe, now Novell Desktop solutions. And certainly Debian might also be tempted.But unless you did go to your distribution/vendor support channel and they told you to ask us, we can't help. Nor are we going to, because all of the ones who use splash screens are modified versions. ------------------- Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------ "The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi "Use the Force, Luke." Obi-Wan Kenobi-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:bug-[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf OfYoshinori K.Okuji Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 11:29 PM To: Reshat Sabiq Cc: [email protected]; Reshat Sabiq Subject: Re: Is there a nofb equivalent for grub menu display? On Sunday 08 May 2005 05:20, Reshat Sabiq wrote: P.S. As i said, this is mostly a cosmetic issue. Thanks for clarification. |
_______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
