*Multiboot System Boot Failure?*
------------------------------
OK so I've had this problem before and never got resolution for it that I
could work with and so here I am again with a Windows drive failure on a
multiboot system that now renders ubuntu 9.10 un-useable also?

You'll have to pardon me for my candid opinion on this but just why in the
world would someone write a linux OS boot loader that was DEPENDANT on
WINDOWS to boot? With the boot loader acting this way, ubuntu is no better
than the Windows OS it requires to boot?

I had a Windows xp drive fail yesterday and afterwards ubuntu will not boot
either? I've done Google.com searches out they yeng-yang with references to
"ubuntu live" CDs that are pretty much non-existent. All I can find is the
regular install CD that is referenced here? I did find one site that had
another "flavor" of ubuntu v10.04 that I downloaded but that one IS NOT 9.10
either and all the documentation I've read specifies ubuntu 9.10 "live"?

So since I can't find a simple solution to fix grub I now have a multiboot
computer that I can't use without wiping out the ubuntu load that's on it
and reinstalling and having to do a gazillion updates, reinstall add ons,
etc?

So I need some help on how to configure grub to let ubuntu boot itself
WITHOUT a Windowz XP drive in that box? And it would also be nice to have a
way NOT to have grub depend on Windows to boot ubuntu!

Any help anyone? Oh, and please make it simple as I'm just not a command
line person.

Thanks,

Ken


-- 
To Error is human.  To successfully transfer the blame to someone else shows
good management skills!

www.kenrutledge.com
www.motorsportsvillage.com
www.noteviljustwrong.com
_______________________________________________
Bug-grub mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub

Reply via email to