Kevin Bube writes: > Thank you for the link. One question: in the "Compilation" section it is > noted that the gcc option -Wtraditional is required to work, but as far > as I saw in the existing code nobody uses traditional function > declarations. As there is a reason not to use them, I propose to remove > this requirement as it results in ugly warnings (even errors with > -Werror).
Yes, don't worry about -Wtraditional or any of those options. It's not a requirement--more of a 'lint' check. -- Brian Gough _______________________________________________ Bug-gsl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gsl
