At Wed, 16 Mar 2011 08:03:13 -0400,
James Ward wrote:
> Dunno if this is a bug, but I was comparing the Complex Arithmetic
> routines in Section 5.5 of Numerical Recipes, and gsl_complex_div()
> uses simple complex division while 5.5.5 has a more sophisticated one
> that avoids underflow/overflow.

I agree this should be improved, looking at the references I'm
guessing it comes from Knuth.  I've added a note to the TODO file. Any
patch and/or test cases would be appreciated.

-- 
Brian Gough


_______________________________________________
Bug-gsl mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gsl

Reply via email to